Denis Villeneuve to Direct JAMES BOND？! ｜ Finally, 007 Might Get Smart Again - Error Code Show

WEBVTT

00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:03.919
and the whole drama over at Amazon MGM, with

00:00:03.919 --> 00:00:06.200
the Amazon execs fighting with the broccolis

00:00:06.200 --> 00:00:08.359
about the future of James Bond and everything

00:00:08.359 --> 00:00:10.640
else. Oh my God, when are we gonna get another

00:00:10.640 --> 00:00:12.960
stinking Bond? And everyone's like, who's gonna

00:00:12.960 --> 00:00:17.059
head up Bond? Right? We finally, finally have

00:00:17.059 --> 00:00:21.160
an answer. Denis Villeneuve is going to direct

00:00:21.160 --> 00:00:25.280
the next James Bond film at Amazon. So we know

00:00:25.280 --> 00:00:28.210
he's done with Dune after Dune Messiah. Right.

00:00:28.530 --> 00:00:31.510
But this is the guy that did Blade Runner arrival.

00:00:32.850 --> 00:00:35.609
Now is what's going to be three Dune movies.

00:00:36.109 --> 00:00:38.350
I basically haven't seen anything of this guys.

00:00:38.450 --> 00:00:44.189
That's not good. Right. Like. He's going to direct

00:00:44.189 --> 00:00:46.950
the next James Bond movie for Amazon MGM Studios.

00:00:47.670 --> 00:00:51.689
Jay. What do you think of this choice for a director

00:00:51.689 --> 00:00:59.200
for James Bond? When I think James Bond, I do

00:00:59.200 --> 00:01:05.939
not think Blade Runner or Dune. He did direct

00:01:05.939 --> 00:01:09.879
Sicario, which is a great movie. Another great

00:01:09.879 --> 00:01:12.859
movie that's more, I think, in tune with what

00:01:12.859 --> 00:01:16.400
James Bond like how I envision James Bond. Yeah.

00:01:17.159 --> 00:01:19.719
But no, I mean, this guy has like I'm looking

00:01:19.719 --> 00:01:24.200
at it. This guy has a really great resume. So

00:01:24.200 --> 00:01:29.810
I'm sure it's going to be great. Um, I'm, I would

00:01:29.810 --> 00:01:33.370
be kind of interested. Cause all of his like

00:01:33.370 --> 00:01:36.730
very recent stuff, you know, dune later on our

00:01:36.730 --> 00:01:40.829
arrival. I'd be really interested if he, if he

00:01:40.829 --> 00:01:45.530
can like bring on like a different, I don't know,

00:01:45.670 --> 00:01:48.349
style or feeling of James Bond that we haven't

00:01:48.349 --> 00:01:52.189
seen. That makes sense. Like James Bond movies

00:01:52.189 --> 00:01:55.920
are kind of. They're not as bad as Mission Impossible

00:01:55.920 --> 00:01:58.560
movies, but they kind of do all feel the same,

00:01:58.579 --> 00:02:00.519
if that makes sense. And that was kind of what

00:02:00.519 --> 00:02:04.819
happened with the with the the last iteration

00:02:04.819 --> 00:02:07.620
of Bond is they weren't really dark. Right. It

00:02:07.620 --> 00:02:10.680
was very gritty, very realistic. The Daniel Craig

00:02:10.680 --> 00:02:17.069
Bond was not fantastical really at all. My only

00:02:17.069 --> 00:02:19.830
concern with this pick is my personal hope prior

00:02:19.830 --> 00:02:21.669
to this was they were gonna go back to kind of

00:02:21.669 --> 00:02:25.370
like a classic Bond less gritty more fun right

00:02:25.370 --> 00:02:29.590
a guy who likes being the debonair guy who You

00:02:29.590 --> 00:02:32.629
know drinks and hooks up and does the thing and

00:02:32.629 --> 00:02:36.030
you know Pierce Brosnan and Sean Connery are

00:02:36.030 --> 00:02:41.310
my two favorite 007s Right and both of them had

00:02:41.310 --> 00:02:45.780
this humor to them Right that Daniel Craig did

00:02:45.780 --> 00:02:48.699
not have right the Daniel Craig Bond was not

00:02:48.699 --> 00:02:54.419
amused ever at anything by anything So I was

00:02:54.419 --> 00:02:56.379
hoping that Amazon was gonna kind of go back

00:02:56.379 --> 00:02:59.780
a little bit and do that Which I don't think

00:02:59.780 --> 00:03:02.580
Denis Villeneuve is going to do right. I just

00:03:02.580 --> 00:03:06.360
I don't see that that being said he is an a tour

00:03:06.360 --> 00:03:11.159
filmmaker You're right, maybe Maybe he will bring

00:03:11.159 --> 00:03:13.800
us a bond we've never seen before. What I hope

00:03:13.800 --> 00:03:17.560
is it's not a retread of this gritty Daniel Craig

00:03:17.560 --> 00:03:22.340
like grumpy ass bond that we've had for the last

00:03:22.340 --> 00:03:33.439
number of years. Or or it just might be some

00:03:33.439 --> 00:03:38.530
of the same. Who knows? Yeah. I thought it was

00:03:38.530 --> 00:03:43.370
an interesting pick. I think it's a solid pick.

00:03:43.629 --> 00:03:47.169
Who's the who's the new James Bond? They haven't

00:03:47.169 --> 00:03:49.930
said yet. They just announced the director and

00:03:49.930 --> 00:03:51.370
you know, Deneval News is going to have some

00:03:51.370 --> 00:03:58.669
say in that. Oh, yeah. Yeah. So now that we know

00:03:58.669 --> 00:04:02.770
it was actually a good one. So G .B. News has

00:04:02.770 --> 00:04:07.389
this three front runners for 007. Here are the

00:04:07.389 --> 00:04:10.050
three frontiers. That's a really weird group.

00:04:15.150 --> 00:04:18.189
Tom Holland, Jacob Elordi and Harris Dickinson

00:04:18.189 --> 00:04:24.370
or Timothy Chalamet. I don't like any of those.

00:04:25.629 --> 00:04:39.480
I like none of them. I'm. No. I just don't see

00:04:39.480 --> 00:04:52.480
it. Yeah, I really don't. I don't like any one

00:04:52.480 --> 00:04:58.680
of those. Yeah, I think it just I like it. Just

00:04:58.680 --> 00:05:01.160
help a Twitch chat, but I think he's too old.

00:05:01.500 --> 00:05:05.800
He's 52. Like if if they'd gotten to him. Hell,

00:05:05.839 --> 00:05:09.529
even 10 years ago. Right? Because whoever you

00:05:09.529 --> 00:05:14.110
pick for your bond, you need at least seven to

00:05:14.110 --> 00:05:16.449
nine years because you need at least three movies

00:05:16.449 --> 00:05:20.970
out of them before you change again. And that

00:05:20.970 --> 00:05:23.629
takes seven to nine years. And so I don't think

00:05:23.629 --> 00:05:26.810
Idris Elba at the age of 52 is going to sign

00:05:26.810 --> 00:05:29.750
on for seven years. Ooh, somebody in YouTube

00:05:29.750 --> 00:05:31.490
chat just brought up a really good one. Nicholas

00:05:31.490 --> 00:05:35.189
Holt. That one, I would. Yeah. Mm hmm. I love

00:05:35.189 --> 00:05:40.389
that idea. Absolutely love that idea. Lex Luthor

00:05:40.389 --> 00:05:45.730
and James Bond, what? And Beast? Yes, let's go.

00:05:45.949 --> 00:05:47.870
Nicholas Holt. Oh, I hadn't thought of that.

00:05:47.870 --> 00:05:54.990
That's a good one. And he is British. And he's

00:05:54.990 --> 00:06:05.060
a good actor. So this is really interesting.

00:06:05.199 --> 00:06:08.079
I'm reading this like kind of article from GQ

00:06:08.079 --> 00:06:17.819
about Tom Harle. Yes, which he does. He is young

00:06:17.819 --> 00:06:24.360
like. You could do. A trilogy of James Bond movies

00:06:24.360 --> 00:06:28.459
just fine. I think he could also like maybe bring

00:06:28.459 --> 00:06:31.939
some of that light hearted. Ness of James Bond

00:06:31.939 --> 00:06:34.060
that you're kind of wanting. He's too short.

00:06:34.899 --> 00:06:36.699
He is really short. But something that's really

00:06:36.699 --> 00:06:41.720
interesting is that he is that he pitched doing

00:06:41.720 --> 00:06:45.639
a James Bond origin story. James Bond is like

00:06:45.639 --> 00:06:48.240
a lot younger, I guess, like kind of being changed,

00:06:48.259 --> 00:06:53.120
like trained. He pitched it. It didn't work out.

00:06:53.160 --> 00:06:55.160
And that's actually what gave him the lead role

00:06:55.160 --> 00:06:58.060
of uncharted. But that would be kind of interesting,

00:06:58.060 --> 00:07:01.600
like a younger James Bond. Yeah. who's not really

00:07:01.600 --> 00:07:03.600
all that good and kind of stumbles every now

00:07:03.600 --> 00:07:06.439
and then. It could be somebody in Twitch chat

00:07:06.439 --> 00:07:08.759
saying Holt's too skinny. You can make anybody

00:07:08.759 --> 00:07:11.839
big. Look, seriously, go watch what Hugh Jackman

00:07:11.839 --> 00:07:15.379
does for Wolverine appearances. He is not that

00:07:15.379 --> 00:07:18.360
big normally. Right. He's talked extensively

00:07:18.360 --> 00:07:21.540
about the six to nine months worth of work that

00:07:21.540 --> 00:07:24.899
he puts in to get that big again every time he

00:07:24.899 --> 00:07:29.040
goes back to play Wolverine. Nobody's really

00:07:29.040 --> 00:07:32.259
very few people really naturally that big. Right.

00:07:34.060 --> 00:07:36.160
So, again, Nicholas Holt, you could beef him

00:07:36.160 --> 00:07:38.660
up. But I don't think, you know, I don't think

00:07:38.660 --> 00:07:41.980
Bond needs to be burly per se. I can't think

00:07:41.980 --> 00:07:54.259
of really a burly Bond we've ever had. No. No.

00:07:54.600 --> 00:07:56.889
Yeah. I mean, he's in shape, but. I don't think

00:07:56.889 --> 00:08:00.250
that's a requirement for the character. I think

00:08:00.250 --> 00:08:02.490
Nicholas Holt is my favorite. That's a good one.

00:08:04.209 --> 00:08:05.790
And he's young enough to where he could do it

00:08:05.790 --> 00:08:10.449
for 10 years. You know, that's true. Yeah, he's

00:08:10.449 --> 00:08:15.089
like 35. So signing a 10 year deal to do that

00:08:15.089 --> 00:08:18.089
now, I don't know if his schedules, I don't know

00:08:18.089 --> 00:08:19.470
what his schedule is going to look like with

00:08:19.470 --> 00:08:23.170
DC stuff with him tagged to play Lex Luthor.

00:08:23.269 --> 00:08:25.699
I don't know what kind of deal he signed. with

00:08:25.699 --> 00:08:29.360
Warner Brothers to play Lex, so that could get

00:08:29.360 --> 00:08:33.580
in the way as well, but we'll see. Anyway, I

00:08:33.580 --> 00:08:35.220
thought that was some interesting movie news,

00:08:35.500 --> 00:08:36.799
so I wanted to throw that in there.